Pleading Precedents Compliance

17th Civil Court of Florianopolis · Case 5012345-67.2025.8.24.0023

Defendant's Response to Complaint

II. Preliminary Matters

Plaintiff lacks standing under the framework consolidated by REsp 1.704.520/MT, which establishes that consumer-relationship qualification requires factual demonstration that has not been met by the initial complaint.

III. On the Merits

The contractual clause challenged by Plaintiff is fully aligned with the binding thesis of Theme 952/STJ, which expressly authorized the modality contracted herein, with no abusiveness as a matter of law.

Furthermore, the binding orientation of ADI 5,452/STF on consumer protection limits, applied here as paradigm, reinforces the regularity of the contractual provision.

Delivered Artifacts

📑

Procedural Pleading

18 pages · markdown

↓

⚖️

Precedent Table

34 cited · 5 layers

↓

🔍

Verification Log

34/34 confirmed

↓

📜

Compliance Declaration

EU AI · LGPD · OAB

↓

✓

All citations verified. Every cited precedent confirmed against the case-law base before delivery.

DIFERENCIAL 01

DIFERENCIAL 02

📑

⚖️

🔍

📜

CPC 927

Zero

MagicLegal_BR - AutoJus